Skip to Main Content
 

Amended MSRB Rules G-37 and G-8 Require Enhanced Disclosure

April 4, 2013

On April 1, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved amendments to MSRB Rules G-37 and G-8 that require enhanced disclosure and recordkeeping with regard to contributions made by brokers, dealers, and municipal securities dealers to bond ballot measure campaigns. 

The amendments aim to shed additional light on the bond ballot measure activity of dealers and municipal finance professionals to address concerns that dealers are awarded lucrative municipal securities business in return for actively supporting a bond campaign.  Importantly, the amendments do not broaden the scope of the contributions that trigger Rule G-37's two-year ban on municipal securities business to include contributions to bond ballot measure campaigns.  The amendments only affect Rule G-37 and G-8's disclosure and recordkeeping requirements.  The requirements take effect on July 1, 2013, and apply to municipal securities offerings with a sale or issuance date on or after July 1, 2013.  

More extensive disclosure of bond ballot contributions required, including two-year look-back

Under newly-amended Rule G-37, brokers, dealers, and municipal securities dealers will now be required to disclose the following additional information with regard to contributions to bond ballot campaigns made by the broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer, municipal finance professionals (MFPs), non-MFP executive officers, and any political action committee controlled by the municipal securities dealer or one of its MFPs:

  • Information regarding in-kind contributions to a bond ballot campaign, including the value and nature of the goods or services, including ancillary services, provided to, on behalf of, or "in furtherance of" the bond ballot measure campaign;
  • The specific date on which a contribution (direct or in-kind) was made;
  • Any payments or reimbursements received by a dealer or its MFPs from a third party that are "related to" any bond ballot contribution; 
  • The full issuer name and the full description of any primary offering resulting from voter approval of a bond ballot measure to which a reportable contribution has been made;  and
  • The date on which the broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer was selected to engage in municipal securities business, reported in the quarter in which the closing date authorized by the bond ballot campaign occurred.   

The amendments also impose a two-year look-back, requiring the disclosure of any contributions by an MFP or non-MFP executive officer of a dealer that were made during the two years prior to that individual becoming an MFP or non-MFP executive officer.  These contributions must be disclosed in the same manner as if the person had been an MFP or non-MFP executive officer at the time of making the contribution. 

Close monitoring of contributions, including in-kind contributions, and campaign finance law compliance required

Detecting and disclosing in-kind contributions may pose significant challenges for municipal securities dealers, particularly because the SEC has recently taken an expansive view of the activity that constitutes an in-kind contribution.  As we noted in a previous alert, the SEC recently imposed a multi-million dollar sanction on Goldman Sachs & Co. for, among other things, failing to review, detect, and disclose in-kind contributions made by a company vice-president to the gubernatorial campaign of then-Massachusetts Treasurer Timothy Cahill, as required by Rule G-37.  The in-kind contributions at issue included campaign activity conducted during work hours and the use of company resources, including phones, computers, e-mail, and office space, to assist Cahill's campaign. 

When viewed in light of the SEC's recent enforcement activity, the amendments to Rules G-37 and G-8 will require municipal securities dealers to adopt and rigorously enforce procedures designed to ensure the detection and disclosure of contributions, including in-kind contributions, to bond ballot measure campaigns.  Such procedures should include closely monitoring the activities of politically-active MFPs and executive officers, as simply requiring MFPs and executive officers to report their contributions to bond ballot campaigns is insufficient. 

Additionally, because the amendments will require the public disclosure of any payments or reimbursements received from a third party that are related to a bond ballot contribution, municipal securities dealers that receive such payments or reimbursements—such as in the form of raising funds to be passed on to or spent in support of a bond campaign—should be especially aware that doing so may result in the dealer being required to register as a ballot measure committee and/or file disclosure reports with the local election oversight body and ensure compliance with any such requirements.  In some jurisdictions, acting as an intermediary for contributions may even be prohibited outright. 

If you have any questions about this Alert, please contact a member of Caplin & Drysdale's Political Law Group.

Trevor Potter
202.862.5092
tpotter@capdale.com


Kirk L. Jowers
202.862.5057
kjowers@capdale.com
 

Joseph M. Birkenstock
202.862.7836
jbirkenstock@capdale.com

________________________________________________

About Caplin & Drysdale
Having celebrated our 50th Anniversary in 2014, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of tax, tax controversy, and litigation legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.

The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills - combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment - make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.

With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:

-Bankruptcy
-Business, Investment & Transactional Tax
-Complex Litigation
-Corporate Law
-Employee Benefits
-Exempt Organizations
-International Tax
-Political Law
-Private Client
-Tax Controversies
-Tax Litigation
-White Collar Defense

For more information, please visit us at www.caplindrysdale.com.

Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
202.862.5000
        New York, NY Office:
600 Lexington Avenue
21st Floor 
New York, NY 10022
212.379.6000

___________________________

Disclaimer
This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.

© 2017 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.