On April 15, the Internal Revenue Service issued a private letter ruling (PLR 201616002) concluding that charitable donations made by a corporation as part of a matching program designed to incentivize employee contributions to the corporation’s PAC may not be deducted by the corporation as business expenses under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(a).
Internal Revenue Code Section 162(a) (26 U.S.C. § 162(a)) provides a deduction for “ordinary and necessary” expenses paid or incurred in carrying on a trade or business. Section 162(e), however, denies a deduction for any such expenses “paid or incurred in connection with . . . participation in, or intervention in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.” In reaching its conclusion, the IRS reasoned that charitable donations made as part of a PAC matching program are “inextricably linked” to, and therefore made “in connection with,” the PAC contributions made by participating employees. Private letter rulings are not precedential authority, but they provide important guidance as to how the IRS is likely to approach an issue.
Charitable donation matching programs are used by many corporations to motivate PAC contributions, and have been approved by the Federal Election Commission on various occasions, including the Commission’s recent approval of Wal-Mart’s 2-1 matching program.
The deductibility of such matching donations as business expenses, however, has been less clear until now. The IRS’s Chief Counsel’s office concluded long ago that such donations are not deductible under Internal Revenue Code Section 170, which provides a deduction for certain charitable contributions (IRS General Counsel Memorandum 39877, Aug. 27, 1992), but that conclusion did not directly affect their deductibility as ordinary and necessary business expenses under Section 162(a). And in 1962 (Revenue Ruling 62-156), the IRS determined that expenses for politically impartial advertising to encourage the public to vote and contribute to candidates and political parties of their choice would be deductible under 162(a), suggesting that corporate donations made in connection with a PAC matching program might similarly be deductible. With the issuance of this ruling, however, it appears the IRS is likely to disagree with taxpayers taking the position that they are deductible as business expenses.
Caplin & Drysdale's Political Law Group counsels for-profit corporations, nonprofit entities, and their principals on these and other matters relating to political law compliance. We work collaboratively with in-house personnel to craft tailored political activity policies and programs. If you have questions concerning this alert or for more information, please contact:
About Caplin & Drysdale
Having celebrated our 50th Anniversary in 2014, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of tax, tax controversy, and litigation legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.
The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills - combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment - make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.
With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:
For more information, please visit us at www.caplindrysdale.com.
Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle, NW
Washington, DC 20005
New York, NY Office:
600 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.
© 2017 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.