Mark Matthews Comments on Value of DOJ's Non-Target Letters
Caplin & Drysdale

Mark Matthews Comments on Value of DOJ's Non-Target Letters

Date: 6/1/2016

Tax Notes spoke with Caplin & Drysdale's Mark E. Matthews concerning the potential value of non-target letters available to institutions in categories 3 and 4 of the Justice Department's Swiss bank program.  For the full article, please visit Tax Noteswebsite (subscription required).

Excerpt taken from the article "Despite Less Certainty, Swiss Bank Non-Target Letters Valuable" by Nathan J. Richman for Tax Notes.

Some have questioned the value of the non-target letters available to banks in categories 3 and 4. For example, Mark E. Matthews of Caplin & Drysdale Chtd. said that DOJ non-target letters provide little formal protection because of common exceptions for newly discovered facts or if the bank provides false information. "It is really more of a Good Housekeeping seal of approval," he said, adding that the professional costs of obtaining the letters may outweigh their value in many situations.

Related Professionals

Related Practice Area(s)

View our non-mobile site Menu