On December 23, 2016, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Notice 2017-10 identifying certain transactions involving conservation easements as “listed transactions.” For several years the IRS has been actively examining conservation easements and litigating such cases in the U.S. Tax Court. The new “listed transaction” designation puts certain conservation easement transactions into a tax reporting and recordkeeping regime that may lead to additional IRS income tax and promoter examinations and potentially significant penalties.
Section 170(f)(3)(B)(iii) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) allows a deduction for a qualified conservation contribution. In general, a qualified conservation contribution is a donation of an interest in real property to a qualified charitable organization exclusively for conservation purposes. The donated real property must be subject to a permanent use restriction promoting its preservation. See Code section 170(h). Conservation easements were intended to incentivize private land owners to restrict development of environmentally and historically sensitive lands. However, recent growth in the popularity of conservation easements has lead to the development of a sub-industry in the financial services market, which involves the syndication of real property investments to obtain the charitable contribution deduction under Code section 170.
Notice 2017-10 states that syndicated conservation easement transactions with certain characteristics are tax avoidance transactions and identifies such transactions, and substantially similar transactions, as “listed transactions” within the meaning of the Code. A syndicated conservation easement transaction constitutes a “listed transaction” in the following situation: The transaction promoter identifies or forms a pass-through entity, such as a partnership or Subchapter S corporation, that owns real property. The promoter seeks out prospective investors by suggesting that they may be entitled to a share of the charitable contribution deduction that equals or exceeds two-and-one-half times the amount of the investment. Investors purchase interests in the pass-through entity either directly or through another pass-through entity. The pass-through entity obtains an appraisal that may inflate the value of the real property, places a restriction on use of the property, and donates the property to a tax-exempt organization. The investors claim charitable contribution deductions with respect to the donation.
Each investor, pass-through entity, promoter, appraiser, and any material advisor must report the transaction to the IRS, including the IRS Office of Tax Shelter Analysis. For transactions entered into during a tax year for which the participant’s Federal tax return is due between December 23, 2016 and May 1, 2017, the participant must file a Form 8886 by May 1, 2017. By June 21, 2017, participants will also have to file Forms 8886 for each transaction entered into during a prior tax year for which the participant’s Federal tax return has already been filed. Finally, they must report any additional participation in syndicated conservation easement transactions, by filing Form 8886 with future annual tax returns. Under Code section 6707A, each incomplete, unfiled, or late-filed Form 8886 is subject to a penalty in the amount of 75 percent of the decrease in tax shown on the taxpayer’s return as a result of the transaction, up to a maximum penalty of $100,000 for natural persons and $200,000 for all other taxpayers. There may be other consequences from such failures as well, such as an extended period of limitations on assessment. The tax-exempt organization to which the property was donated is not considered a participant and does not have to report under the Notice.
Material advisors, as defined under Code section 6111, must report the transaction by filing Form 8918 by May 1, 2017. Under Code section 6707, each incomplete, unfiled, or late-filed Form 8918 is subject to a penalty in the amount of the greater of $200,000 or 50 percent of the gross income derived by the material advisor from the transaction. According to the Notice, retroactive reporting is required for syndicated conservation easement transactions entered into on or after January 1, 2010. Further, material advisors become subject to additional recordkeeping (“list maintenance”) obligations under Code section 6112, and may be subject to further penalties for failure to timely supply the required list to the IRS upon request.
Caplin & Drysdale's Tax Controversy attorneys have extensive experience with the reporting and recordkeeping regimes for listed transactions. If you have questions about this Alert, please contact:
About Caplin & Drysdale
Having celebrated our 50th Anniversary in 2014, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of tax, tax controversy, and litigation legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.
The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills - combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment - make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.
With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:
For more information, please visit us at www.caplindrysdale.com.
Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle, NW
Washington, DC 20005
New York, NY Office:
600 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.
© 2017 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.