Skip to Main Content
 

Tax Notes Today Quotes Christopher Rizek: Previous Taxpayer Rights Bills Offer Lessons for Current Efforts

June 10, 2014, Tax Notes Today

Christopher S. Rizek is quoted by Tax Notes Today concerning the issues that arise when taxpayers rights legislation does not have bipartisan support. The article specifically focuses on taxpayers rights bills such as, TBOR 1, TBOR 2, and RR '98. For the complete article, please visit Tax Notes Today's website (subscription required).


Excerpt taken from the article. 

According to Vance, congressional staff had the support of Treasury and the IRS on the taxpayer rights bills. "IRS was always on board with us," she said.

That consensus fell apart when Congress was working on RRA '98, according to Christopher S. Rizek of Caplin & Drysdale, who worked on TBOR 2 and RRA '98 at Treasury as an attorney-adviser and associate tax legislative counsel. Rizek said he remembers the political atmosphere surrounding RRA '98 as being much more contentious and the bill suffering as a result.

The bipartisan work ethos changed after politics were injected into the process by Finance Committee hearings in the fall of 1997 that detailed supposed IRS abuses of taxpayers, Rizek said at a recent Tax Analysts forum on taxpayer bills of rights. (Prior coverage: Tax Notes, Mar. 31, 2014, p. 1379.)

In 1998, when Republicans controlled both chambers of Congress and a Democrat sat in the White House, the two parties were "at each other's throats," Rizek said. A House bill that had consensus support became much more controversial in the Senate because of Treasury and IRS opposition, he said.
RRA '98 "was not, I think it's fair to say, exactly the same signal success" as the previous taxpayer rights bills, Rizek said. "In particular, some of the administrative provisions have turned out to be a little bit of a mixed bag," he said. "But I think what it teaches us is that to work out good taxpayer rights legislation, you have to have tax professionals talking to each other and working out carefully and well-thought-out incremental changes to existing policies."

...

Rizek said that a taxpayer's lack of ability to appeal a CDP determination is the perfect example of how rights don't exist without a way to enforce them and that the problem with the broad taxpayer rights outlined in Publication 1 is that they're not enforceable. "It's a truism, I think, in the law: You can't have a right unless you have a remedy," he said.


 

________________________________________________

About Caplin & Drysdale
Having celebrated our 50th Anniversary in 2014, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of tax, tax controversy, and litigation legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.

The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills - combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment - make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.

With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:

-Bankruptcy
-Business, Investment & Transactional Tax
-Complex Litigation
-Corporate Law
-Employee Benefits
-Exempt Organizations
-International Tax
-Political Law
-Private Client
-Tax Controversies
-Tax Litigation
-White Collar Defense

For more information, please visit us at www.caplindrysdale.com.

Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
202.862.5000
        New York, NY Office:
600 Lexington Avenue
21st Floor 
New York, NY 10022
212.379.6000

___________________________

Disclaimer
This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.

© 2017 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.

Related Professionals

Related Practices