Skip to Main Content
 

Transfer Pricing Report Quotes Peter Barnes on the OECD's Country-by-Country Reporting Template

April 7, 2014, Transfer Pricing Report

Bloomberg BNA's Transfer Pricing Report spoke with Peter A. Barnes regarding recent changes to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's template for country-by-country reporting. The OECD now requires aggregated financial data rather than separate legal entity information, however, it is uncertain whether the new format will significantly reduce compliance burden for companies and simplify the process for multinational corporations. For the complete article, please click on the PDF above.
 
Excerpt taken from the article. Reproduced with permission from Tax Management Transfer Pricing Report, 22 TMTR 1491, 04/07/2014. Copyright 2014 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800 372-1033) http://www.bna.com.
 
Two other practitioners—William Morris, chair of the tax committee of the OECD's Business and Industry Advisory Committee, and Alison Lobb of Deloitte in London—agreed with Brimicombe, but Peter Barnes of Caplin & Drysdale in Washington, D.C., said the burden of gathering information would be largely the same for companies. Barnes, who also is a senior fellow at Duke University, said that in almost all cases, taxpayers will have to use legal entity data to compile the aggregate number.
 
Barnes, former chief tax counsel at General Electric, raised a different concern. Most taxpayers assume that the country-by-country information eventually will be made public even though the OECD has said the information will be used only by governments. "If the information is going to go public, then most companies will prefer to have aggregate data revealed, rather than separate legal entity information," he said.
 
Barnes said he understands why governments want taxpayers to provide business codes, "but the requirement has the potential to create big disputes, without necessarily giving governments a big benefit."
 
A company, Barnes said, may have a very small amount of its activity fall into one of the categories for which there is a business code. Under the applicable accounting rules, the amount of activity may be so small that the accounting rules do not even require segmented accounts for that line of business.
 
Yet, Barnes said, if the taxpayer omits a particular code, the government may believe the taxpayer is hiding information, or failing to fill out the template correctly.
 
Barnes said providing aggregated information is a good step, "but this compromise leaves open the likelihood of disputes and does not affect the burden imposed on taxpayers."
 
Barnes, meanwhile, said allowing flexibility on the source of data is "an essential move" because companies have different internal reporting systems.

 
Barnes argued that if corporations are to suffer opprobrium for tax planning, then so too should individuals who follow questionable advice from personal finance magazines. He pointed out that the largest companies are under continuous IRS audit -- GE has IRS agents on its premises every day who have the opportunity to issue information document requests for explanations of return positions.
 
Barnes responded that corporations understand the need to maintain a cooperative relationship with governments.
 

________________________________________________

About Caplin & Drysdale
Having celebrated our 50th Anniversary in 2014, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of tax, tax controversy, and litigation legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.

The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills - combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment - make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.

With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:

-Bankruptcy
-Business, Investment & Transactional Tax
-Complex Litigation
-Corporate Law
-Employee Benefits
-Exempt Organizations
-International Tax
-Political Law
-Private Client
-Tax Controversies
-Tax Litigation
-White Collar Defense

For more information, please visit us at www.caplindrysdale.com.

Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
202.862.5000
        New York, NY Office:
600 Lexington Avenue
21st Floor 
New York, NY 10022
212.379.6000

___________________________

Disclaimer
This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.

© 2017 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.

Related Professionals

Related Practices