Skip to Main Content

Law360 Quotes Elizabeth Stevens on BEAT Policies to Look Out For Later This Year

July 5, 2018, Law360

A U.S. Department of Treasury official recently said that guidance for the federal tax overhaul’s complex international provisions will be out by the fall, but in the meantime, Law360 looks ahead at how the government could answer some particularly knotty questions about these measures.

. . .

Pass-Through Costs and BEAT

Another TCJA measure, the base erosion and anti-abuse tax, or BEAT, limits deductions on payments by a U.S. corporate entity to related parties abroad, to ensure it doesn’t reduce its U.S. taxable income to less than 10 percent. But specialists have pointed to the broad nature of the provision and the places for potential carve-outs.

For instance, a foreign company could incur a cost to a third party for services that benefit the entire corporate group, such as for developing an information technology system or providing marketing services. It’s very common for that foreign company to allocate that cost on a pass-through basis to its affiliates, including those in the U.S., according to Elizabeth Stevens of Caplin & Drysdale, Chtd.

Going strictly on the face of the statute, the U.S. affiliate’s payment to its parent for that cost would appear to be a base erosion payment, she said. However, Stevens noted that Treasury may have regulatory authority to carve out a payment like that because it is ultimately going to a third party.

“They could probably require that the taxpayer demonstrate that this payment is actually a pass-through to a third party and they could construct some limiting criterion around that,” she said, adding that “still, it seems like that would be ripe for a carve-out.”

Deductible Payments and BEAT

Another issue with BEAT stems from the requirements that trigger the tax in the first place. For BEAT to apply, U.S. multinationals must earn over $500 million and have a base erosion percentage of 3 percent, which is calculated by dividing the taxpayer’s deductions for base erosion payments by its total deductions, with some exceptions.

Stevens said the statute could be read to say that if a U.S. consolidated group has a lot of domestic companies, then deductible payments among those companies should go into the denominator of the BEAT equation, which would tend to make the denominator much bigger.

Even though those payments are balanced out on consolidation — because deductions have corresponding income inclusions — they’re still deductions on a company-by-company basis, Stevens noted.

As for potential regulations, Stevens thinks the taxpayer-friendly approach would be to say that deductible payments between members of a U.S. group would go into the denominator of the base erosion percentage.

“Because that will tend to make the denominator bigger, which will make the overall percentage smaller, which makes it less likely that the taxpayer will trip and fall into the BEAT,” she said.

For the full article, please visit Law360’s website (subscription required).

Excerpt taken from the article “6 Possible TJCA Policies To Look Out For: Midyear Report” by Natalie Olivo for Law360.


About Caplin & Drysdale
Celebrating our 55th Anniversary in 2019, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.

The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills -- combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment -- make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.

With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:
For more information, please visit us at
Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
New York, NY Office:
295 Madison Avenue
12th Floor
New York, NY 10017


This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.
© 2022 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.