Skip to Main Content

Zhanna Ziering Comments on U.S. Enforcement of FBAR Violations with Tax Notes

May 26, 2017, Tax Notes

The United States filed an amended complaint seeking recovery of foreign bank account reporting penalties on a trust administrator and the family of an alleged willful FBAR violator — a deceased seller of jewelry purported to affect the wearer’s chi.

While until recently it has been unusual for the IRS to apply the concept of transferee liability to an FBAR case, Zhanna A. Ziering of Caplin & Drysdale, Chtd. noted that the government’s assertion of liability was reminiscent of estate tax cases and the assertion of transferee liability in so-called midco cases.

“Somebody at the [Justice Department] must have said, ‘Well, why don’t we do this here?’” Ziering said. “It was a novel idea in this context, and I think we are going to see more of it because the government is reaching further to protect their interests,” she added.

Ziering also noted that after the initial complaint was filed in Park, an amended complaint was filed only a few weeks later in U.S. v. Estate of Schoenfeld, 16-cv-1248 (MD Florida), in which the government named the decedent’s closest relative as a defendant in an FBAR case after the decedent’s estate transferred retirement funds to the relative. The Schoenfeld complaint did not offer as much detail about the transferee liability as Park, which alleged fraudulent transfer, though in both cases the government “was following the money,” Ziering said.

. . .

Ziering, looking to paragraph 68 in the second amended complaint, foresaw the “main fight” coming down to when the United States became a creditor.

“Was it on the date of the violation or at the time the penalty was assessed?” Ziering said. She added that even if the United States was found to be a creditor in 2014, that may not end the dispute by itself “as some transfers may still be subject to a clawback.”

To view the full article, please visit Tax Notes' website (subscription required).

Excerpt taken from the article "Government’s Amended FBAR Complaint Seeks to Center Its Chi" by Andrew Velarde for Tax Notes.


About Caplin & Drysdale
Celebrating our 55th Anniversary in 2019, Caplin & Drysdale continues to be a leading provider of legal services to corporations, individuals, and nonprofits throughout the United States and around the world. We are also privileged to serve as legal advisors to accounting firms, financial institutions, law firms, and other professional services organizations.

The firm's reputation over the years has earned us the trust and respect of clients, industry peers, and government agencies. Moreover, clients rely on our broad knowledge of the law and our keen insights into their business concerns and personal interests. Our lawyers' strong tactical and problem-solving skills -- combined with substantial experience handling a variety of complex, high stakes, matters in a boutique environment -- make us one the nation's most distinctive law firms.

With offices in New York City and Washington, D.C., Caplin & Drysdale's core practice areas include:
For more information, please visit us at
Washington, DC Office:
One Thomas Circle NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
New York, NY Office:
600 Lexington Avenue
21st Floor
New York, NY 10022


This communication does not provide legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with you or any other reader. If you require legal guidance in any specific situation, you should engage a qualified lawyer for that purpose. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising
It is possible that under the laws, rules, or regulations of certain jurisdictions, this may be construed as an advertisement or solicitation.
©2021 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
All Rights Reserved.

Related Professionals

Related Practice Area(s)